iPod Photo Underwhelming
Everyone’s all aflutter today over the iPod Photo (tagline-”why should your ears have all the fun?”). Just so we’re clear on what the iPod Photo is, it’s an iPod that will display (importantly, not take) images. On “a vivid two-inch screen”. What kind of world do we live in when a two-inch screen is a feature to boast about? It’s got all of 220 x 176 pixel resolution. The 40 GB version costs about CAN $130 more than the standard iPod.
What’s the use case scenario for this thing? It’s implicit to me that the majority of people use their iPods when they’re alone. Why, then, would you want to store a bunch of photos on your digital music player? Something to look at while you’re listening? Are you that lame? If that was Apple’s reasoning, they should just put better games on the thing and deliver us from a world of Breakout knockoffs.
I guess this is for people who don’t have a laptop, don’t want to print photos out and want to show digital photos to people where there aren’t computers. Where’s that? Hiking in the woods? On the subway? I don’t get it.
Yes, there are probably rare times when you both have your iPod and want to show a photo to somebody. And I can see that having colour on the display might be aesthetically appealing, and is the natural evolution of the device. Still, does this really merit this much excitement and coverage? But, then, if a janitor at Apple takes a bad spill in a sub-basement, the technology press covers it.
In short, Apple, I’m unimpressed. Next time, just make the thing smaller again.
