March 28th, 2008, 9 Comments »
Everybody seems to be up in arms over the music industry’s new proposal for a new American tax to save their industry. The always-raging Michael Arrington leads the charge:
Good musicians will always find a way to make money. Others may have to follow their passion as a hobby and (shudder) get a day job to pay the bills. But if a music tax is put in place, that innovation will die, and with guaranteed revenues and profits, the need to innovate, market and compete will also die. A music tax is a sure fire way to destroy an industry that is just beginning to really blossom.
The tax would allegedly be $5/month, charged by all participating ISPs. I imagine that it would become buried in your monthly internet bill, much like the private copying levy is embedded into the price of Canadian iPods, hard drives and recordable media. While technically you might be able to seek out an ISP that isn’t participating in the program, the industry would goad, bribe, sweet talk or sue dissenting ISPs into a more agreeable stance.
As Arrington points out in a subsequent post, the plan is basically a “covenant not to sue anyone who pays the fee”.
The idea of a $5 a month tax isn’t new. In fact, the Electronic Frontier Foundation proposed a very similar approach three years ago. The only difference is that their levy would be voluntary:
The concept is simple: the music industry forms a collecting society, which then offers file-sharing music fans the opportunity to “get legit” in exchange for a reasonable regular payment, say $5 per month. So long as they pay, the fans are free to keep doing what they are going to do anyway—share the music they love using whatever software they like on whatever computer platform they prefer—without fear of lawsuits. The money collected gets divided among rights-holders based on the popularity of their music.
I still think artists ought to be paid for their work (heck, I made a website about it). Would I pay $5 per month to get complete access to all music ever recorded, avoid prosecution and forget about the phrase ‘traffic shaping’? In a heartbeat. I already pay eMusic $15 a month to download 50 songs from a comparatively small archive of 3 million. Such a tax like this would be a discount.
Just as the Canadian levy is applied to a lot of consumers who have never illegally downloaded a song, a de facto mandatory tax will punish the many for the actions of the few. The music industry ought to make this tax voluntary, and take what they can get.
9 Comments »
May 13th, 2007, 8 Comments »
Yesterday on TechCrunch I read about Cluztr, a new web service which enables you to publish your clickstream (basically, your web browser’s history) for any and all to see. From TechCrunch:
Every site you visit is recorded and posted live to the Cluztr site in a social bookmarking style format, but without the need for active involvement; a Firefox plugin does it automatically.
The wealth of data has benefits outside of letting people watch. Content matching links users with similar clickstreams and creates site recommendations based on user history.
Cluztr is also a chat platform. Cluztr users visiting a particular page are automatically displayed in the sidebar allowing discussions on the topic at hand. A privacy option is available. Clickstreams can be set to private or public.
So blogs enable you to share your opinions with the world, Twitter enables you to share your day-to-day activities with the world, and Cluztr enables you to share everything you view online. What’s next?
I’m sure there’s two guys in a garage somewhere who know the answer to that question.
Nude Photos of Tricia Helfer
Boy, that heading is going to disappoint a lot of web surfers, but I use it to make a point. There’s nothing wrong with looking at nude photos of Tricia Helfer (provided she approved their publication and you’re doing it in moderation and so forth). However, I’m not sure you’d want the world to know exactly which photos you looked at, and for how long, and so forth. And, of course, there are plenty of otherwise rational people who might frown on somebody for looking at naked Ms. Helfer or scientology articles or an anti-gun website or, frankly, a good portion of the sites on the web.
I know there’s a privacy setting, but I’m too absent minded to remember where I put my sunglasses. So the likelihood of my forgetting to switch that rather important toggle from Everybody’s Welcome to Hide my Pantaloon Fetish From the World is way, way too high.
What’s the difference between Cluztr and a blog or Twitter? The latter have active filters–the act of typing the thing out and clicking ‘publish’, and are fundamentally designed for broadcasting stuff.
Cluztr, on the other hand, takes a formerly (or mostly, if you’re surfing the web from a workplace) private act and passively makes it public. That sounds a little too dangerous for me.
And then there’s the whole Heisenberg thing. By measuring your web surfing, you’ll inevitably change your habits. If you’re uber-addicted to, say, lolcats, then that might be healthy, but otherwise I wouldn’t want to self-censor where I surf, just because I thought somebody might find fault with my private behaviour.
Incidentally, the first blogger who adds his or her clickstream to their RSS feed is going to receive a swift beating-by-mail from Malta. I didn’t subscribe to your blog to learn about your love of weimaraners.
Won’t Anybody Think of the Marketers?
Aside from the too-much-information angle, consider what new volumes of consumer data Cluztr users are creating. Presumably you’ll be able to slice, dice, filter and query the Cluztr database in interesting ways. Marketers will be constantly monitoring their competitors on Cluztr, and then contact users who visit them? Every once in a while, if tactfully done, then that might work great. Unfortunately, it’ll be ripe for abuse.
And don’t even get me started with the Cluztr spam. In three months time will legions of Chinese workers put down their virtual swords and plowshares and get paid simply to surf between the same three sites over and over and over again? How do I become an alpha user on Cluztr?
On a related note, let me quote a Digg user who said “I’m getting sickr and sickr of Web 2.0 names.”
There is an event horizon for misspellings of common words, and Cluztr may have crossed it. Saying “Bright with a y” or “Flickr with no e” is one thing, but “that’s cluster with a zed instead of the s and no e”?
How many letters must we misplace before we’re naming companies, like, Dckcyr: “so, that’s ‘deckchair’, but without the e, and replace the y with h, a and i.”
8 Comments »
