David Beers (and Everybody Else) on Managing Online Communities

May 16th, 2007, 2 Comments »

I stopped reading The Tyee’s comment threads a while ago because they simply go too long, and were frequently unformatted (there were long, long paragraphs without breaks). The Tyee’s founding editor David Beers has written a kind of state of the union on site comments, and a follow-up on the changes they’ve made to their commenting and moderation systems. There stats weren’t surprising, but they’re worth repeating:

We note (from our reader surveys) that less than one per cent of our readers actually contribute comments. We calculate that a significant majority of our commenters are male. That a handful of commenters are responsible for the majority of comments. That the number of regular commenters is not growing, though our readership is.

They’re moderating much more closely, and implementing a ‘Best Comments’ tab, where Tyee staff promote comments from the mire of discussion. That’s probably a decent approach, but I think there’s more they could do. Here’s the comment I left on the latter article:

There are two pretty common approaches to this issue, which you haven’t chosen to add. The first is multi-threaded conversations. The Tyee’s comment threads can get long, and I’ve always thought there’s a place for a tree-view style of comments which enables multiple conversations to be grouped together. This makes the conversations easier to distinguish and read.

The second is user moderation of comments. This is a proven tactic on a host of venerable online communities, from Slashdot on down. Why place the burden of moderation solely on the (apparently overworked) Tyee staff?

Also, how about permalinks for comments? They exist in the system, but there’s no visible link to them in the comments section.

Interestingly, these articles come on the tail of a bunch of managing online community pieces I’ve read recently. I blogged about three of them over on Capulet’s site, and there’s also Cory Doctorow’s recent piece in InfoWorld.

2 Comments »

The Accidental 100 Mile Diet

May 14th, 2007, 7 Comments »

Somebody I know is starting the 100 mile diet this weekend. Until Thanksgiving, he’s going to try to only eat food produced within 100 miles (160.934 km) from his home in Vancouver. It’s an admirable pursuit. He loves a chore, so I expect he’ll do very well at it.

The purpose, in case you missed it, is to only consume locally grown food, reducing one’s impact on the environment. According to Wikipedia, food in North America typically travels 1,500 miles from farm to plate.

Here on Malta’s smaller island, we’re accidentally engaged in this eating model. Last week we were at the butcher buying some chicken breasts:

JULIE: Where’s your chicken from?
BUTCHER: They’re local. These were killed this morning.

Distance from farm to plate? Probably less than 5 km.

I’m really surprised by the diversity of food that’s locally produced. All of our chicken, fish, pasta, bread, wine, dairy, fruit and vegetables (from fava beans to asparagus, from bananas to watermelon) is local. Some of the canned goods–ketchup, for example–are produced in Malta. Heck, even the Coke I’m drinking is bottled on the main island.

There are certainly some exceptions. Oddly, our Dijon mustard is from Dublin and we’ve got biscuits from Germany. Still, I’d say 90% of our diet falls into a 100-mile radius. That makes me feel slightly less guilty about all the air travel we’re doing. We’re buying carbon credits, but it’s still sub-optimal.

7 Comments »